<body> <body>

Thursday, May 31, 2007

i've decided to blog before a certain hard-to-please individual start hounding me again.

some of us decided to head for mambo last night but zouk was disgustingly crowded and the girls were made to pay cover charge. so we decided to abandon the initial plan and head down to clarke quay. the guys brought us to some dodgy (and seemingly lapsup at first glance) bar, where we spent a good five hours there chilling - playing silly number game which JY taught us, K-ing, talking nonsense, sherman + XX indulged in some traditional game, namely tictactoe (please ask sherman for the score he will proudly announce it to you)


a few sundays ago, chew Soon Kian LJ and i went to batam to cable-ski. unfortunately JY fell ill the day before and couldnt join us. anyway, Chew refused to join for group photo, perhaps some photoshop could help. videos are with Soon and LJ. I leave the uploading to LJ, who particularly loves to self-glorify.

LJ and Kian are rather good at cable-ski. It is only appropriate to stop here to avoid unnecessary ego boost. (: Soon had a breakthrough and managed to stand up and ski and significant distance after persevering for the whole day. Chew, although new to the sport, picked up real quick - he seems to have to potential. ahwell, as for me, it suffice to say that my arm muscles have failed me. ):

Please bug Soon and LJ for videos. (:

PEI YIN!

Labels:




rmb to sign off! sang at 10:02 PM


Friday, May 25, 2007

hey guys,

we'll mostly likely visit g tan on 3 Jun, free or not free..say okok??? shld be meeting 12 noon..cya guys then!

soon



rmb to sign off! sang at 9:17 PM


Thursday, May 17, 2007

hellooo! im back from cambodia and thailand :)) sorry for being MIA for quite some time hahas im sure all of u miss me righty? hahas

anyway, im on for sunday's cable ski :) but i foresee some unforeseen circumstances MAY occur and deter me from going for water sports :( sad but true. only the girls will understand!! hahahs (probably after i say this i think the guys will understand hahahas!) hopefully i can make it to cable ski if not i'll be v sad :(

u all going back sch to play ball this sat? haha im free tooo!! update me ya? thanksss!

now that im back from my overseas trip, im super freeee and i have nothing on! happy and slack life!! hahas feel free to date me pls! hahahas thanks!

love
jy



rmb to sign off! sang at 11:34 AM


Wednesday, May 16, 2007

guess who i met today!

while i was walking my dog this evening, i heard this really high-pitched voice going "PY!" i turned and saw gtan happily sitting in her BMW with her baby! such randomness! (:

she said we could visit her next sat! and she promised that she will be definitely available. soonheng please contact her!

PEI YIN



rmb to sign off! sang at 10:42 PM


hey...mrs tan isn't free on both 19 & 26...so we nd to postpone the visit liao...i guess we'll discuss when we meet up for cableski on sun??? oh..she say she can cook us pasta for lunch if we r turning up early =D but she said she will nd the help of the gals though haha...so who's gonna volunteer??? haha

oh btw...though the visit's off...but ball game anyone??? in sch on sat morning?? bball/vball??



rmb to sign off! sang at 6:50 PM


Sunday, May 13, 2007

Happy mothers' day to all you mothers reading this blog! Sherman's here.

To beloved peiyin: py! How can you tag sth so mushy? You're making me shy! Yeps, no more squash for me (maybe can squeeze in once a week till the end of May). During my attachment, I was already assigned a role for NDP so I bo bian must take part in NDP. Anyway, squash is supposed to end by the end of May whereas NDP ends in August. So logically, NDP takes priority or else I won't be doing anything from the end of May till August.

On a side note, I received the most delightful phone call from camp, ever! Some kind soul had returned my wallet :) PHEW! Still, I've decided to change my wallet to the one I received as a christmas present from my aunt in 2005 which has been rotting in my drawer for quite some time. A new beginning! But remember, please cherish everything and everyone around you.

Ta-ta!



rmb to sign off! sang at 6:07 PM


i also got bugged to blog here.. so here i am.

regarding the recent issue about the ministerial pay hike..
- i have absolutely no idea what's going on
- i dont have time to find out what's going on
- my linguistic abilities (or the lack of) is hindering me from understanding lj's article
- the blog design is actually turning me off (dark background and dark fonts)
- im naturally one who doesnt really care about politics cause..

even if i do who am i to affect them?

we can criticise for all we care but ultimately the decision is made but those on top. im sorry but this is the cold hard truth. i learn this hard in the army.. i try to voice out things but how many times are these complains reflected and things get changed? just ask yourselves this question. u guys have times and times again from the papers that the gahmen has made this change that change blah blah to benefit the pple but on the ground.. how much have u benefited? i dont know about u guys but me who belongs to those of a low income grp (a monthly income less than 1.5 k a month) doesnt feel any benefit here. the only thing i feel is pain in the form of an increase in GST (which is supposed to boost tax which in term increases AE but i dont care) which is beginning to feel a strain in my wallet.

the benefits will come.. it's a sooner or later case. if it's not sooner it's probably later. and i suppose it's the latter aka later. by the time it come.. i wonder how much pain many pple in the lower income grp will feel before the monetary benefits ease their woes. i wonder who here have the same views with me cus i know many of u guys are much better off then me financially but nevertheless, try to feel for them.

i wont say that i have no faith for the gahmen. i still have.. after all it's MM lee and co who started from scratch to build a post-war SG to what we have today.
but sometimes..

when u realise that a few of those in the cabinet are somehow related to MM lee, economic welfare is not felt by many in the lower income grp, and many other instances.. u know it and we know it. it's somehow like an open secret. i wont post it here in case i get charged or something (the power of an open society).. somehow somewhere in your mind u start to wonder whether the gahmen that u see today is the gahmen that u still have complete faith in..

or not.

this is my 2 cents worth. it's not about my pov about the issue.. but more of the political climate today and how i view my role in the society, one who represents a person from a low income grp. u guys can take it or just leave it as it is.. and u all can comment about it. after all it's a free society, isnt it. the freedom of speech.. hur hur



eugene sang at 12:55 PM


Saturday, May 12, 2007

i haven't been blogging i know. lj has been bugging me a couple of times to blog. so now i shall.

exams have ended for me. i thought i would have a slack holiday, but i was clearly mistaken. i managed to get this temp job at a law firm on a very short notice (my friend called in the evening and asked if i could start work the very next day) and this stint will stretch on indefinitely, until the lawyer finds our presence redundant, this is.

it's rather fun actually. we were to look through boxes of evidences to learn about the facts of the case. and the one this firm is handling is rather exciting. by ploughing through the 165 files (think your PW files) we got an idea how disgustingly rich one can be. how can anyone spend $14000 on a pair of glasses in the 1980s. there are loads more gossipy bit, which i cant share online due to confidentiality issues. ):

anyway, its a pity i couldnt join you guys this morning to play ball. bad timing. and i was pretty tired. i hope it was good fun though. is 20th confirmed? and girls going? my foot isnt going to recover by then though, but i hope those waterproof dressings actually work.

sherman, does that mean no more squash for you? why cant you give up NDP for squash? and the GST thing is LAME! lol

hmm, and regarding the very intellectual discussion between kx and lj. i would say i'm not on kx's side. kx, i realise our political views (more like whatever minimal political opinions i actually have) always differ.

and no, i wont launch into another essay, for the simple reason that i never had strong political views. i shall leave you guys with a link - Transcript of Sylvia Lim's Parliamentary Debates. I thought that was a really good speech, subtle sarcasm, witty and to the point. and randomly, during the exams my friends and i got bored and we started counting how much PM Lee earns in a min. Assuming he works every single day without any sleep, he earns approx. $6 a min - you earn about 18 bucks just by going to the toilet to peee. lol.

and i end off with a rather amusing performance by dicklee. the front is pretty nonsense. but the latter parts are hilarious.



enjoy!

PEI YIN (:



rmb to sign off! sang at 11:52 PM


Hello! Sherman here.

Well, I aint that kinda poly-ticks person, neither am I into writing GP essays, so I'll skip the hassle of contributing my 2 cents' worth (after hiked GST maybe 2.14 cents).

I've broken up:'( It hurts, a lot. Phobia of being attached now. Due to NDP commitments, I had to break up. Sad but true (jy's pet phase). Now most of my weekends are gobbled up by meetings, wargaming and walk-the-ground sessions. Helping out in NDP is quite a fun experience, but undoutedly tiring. Basically I'm in charge of releasing the performers to enter the stage as well as receiving them back from the stage. Hmm, but shant bore you guys with the details. Sigh, so I will be missing out on the first ever 64 cable ski outing and wadeva you peeps are gonna plan.

Bad stuff apparently don't come alone. My first Monday in camp for a long long time and I had to LOSE MY WALLET. Haiz.. really dont know how I lose it. The idea of not being able to see the contents in my wallet for the rest of my life (hopefully not) is clearly heartbreaking. So guys, please cherish everything and everyone around you ya? Don't regret only after you lose them. It's really painful. Really.

Take Care!



rmb to sign off! sang at 12:10 AM


Thursday, May 10, 2007

Here's my take on the issue. I think it is controversial because there is a difference between what happens in reality and how we imagine things should be like. We always think that leaders of a country ought to sacrifice to serve the country. They should. It's just a matter of how much of sacrifice they should make. One common argument in this issue is precisely that leaders ought not serve their country for monetary benefits but serve out of a passion to do good for their people. Believe it or not, they are. even with their high salaries. Most of us would never ever be able to earn that amount of money even if we work from the moment we are born till our death, but many people are earning that amount each year and some, even more. My aunt is currently working for Fedex in Hong Kong and she is earning much more than them, excluding all the other benefits she is entitled to. for example, she just shifted house and the penthouse she is currently leaving in has a monthly rent of $60,000 and the company pays for it. She does not have to pay for her maid, for her son to study in the British International School because the company pays for it. Also, the company gives her a few pairs of free SIA tickets each year. And she still has allowance for a car.

Imagine, how much does all that equates too. Of course, pol leaders ought not expect that huge a pay check. But they are among the top talents in SIngapore and if they were not politicians, they would be among the top executives in many multinational firms. Many of them chose to give up their high-paying incomes as doctors (like Dr Ng Eng Hen earns $4-5 million annually as a doctor before he turned to politics) or other professionals and are currently working at a discount.

Besides their monetary sacrifices, the choice to be in political office involves other opportunity costs. For example, the loss of privacy, the loss of private time with families, and to be constantly lambasted by people regardless of their efforts and good intentions. Many of us do not understand the kind of sacrifices they have to make because we never had to go through that.

As some of you know, I am currently helping out regularly at the meet-the-people sessions near my house, under Minister Teo. It is frequent for him to rush from one place to another, from dinners to meetings and to the mps sessions, often not having his dinner till he sees every single resident that turns up (which often is after 12 midnight). Being a volunteer, I stay and help till everything is done and the earliest is 12.30. Most of the time, we end at 2, and at times, 3 am. Think, they have been working ever since the early mornings. Even on normal working days, if you were to email him at 1/2 am, you will be able to receive a reply almost immediately. And sundays and saturdays are also filled with activities.

Of course, many people think mps sessions are easy. After all, you're just talking to residents. If you've tried, you wouldn;t say so. You have to handle all residents, even if they are mentally unstable. You must be able to speeak many languages (Malay, Chinese, dialects,...) and you have to help them solve their problems by giving them suggestions and these problems are not small. It was only after I helped out that I discovered the wide range of complex problems that many people face.

Then again, some people think: But of course, they are paid to do that. Indeed, they are. And they deserve every single cent they are paid. For they are constantly under pressure to manage the country. If they err, the futures of 4 million people will be destroyed in their hands. With such a work schedule, how much family time do they have? Many people argue that in the private sector, executives are under greater scrutiny. Are they? If they are, will Enron scandal even happen? Also, how many executives truly have to work almost 24/7? Even if they do, do people even bat an eyelid at they receiving a pay cheque of at least 5 times that of the maximum that our leaders will receive? No, they don;t.

Many people don't know, but the pol leaders themselves donate some of their income to help the poor in they constituency. I know, because I saw with my own eyes.

The fact and reality is that there are people out there who earn tens of millions of dollars a year. But because few of us have the opportunity to know them, we think $2 million a year is a big deal. And with the global competition for talent heats up, more and more talented people will be lured away from political and public office. It is not that they don't have the passion to serve the country. They do. But the sacrifice is too big. Where else can you earn more money than that and not generate a huge public backlash? Private sector. Where else can you earn that much money and not be ill-informedly labelled as corrupt? private sector.

It is unfortunate that the rise in pay has to be linked to the rise in GST. For those who think GST is high, look at the US. I paid a VAT of 17.5% on every single thing I bought in Las Vegas. Look at the US and London where the income tax is so high. Do you know that in Norway, it is actually better for one parent to work instead of both because of the high taxes? And besides, this is the way forward to maintain our competitiveness. Does everything has to have a cause and effect relationship?

American President earns less. Of course he does. Anyone mentioned the money past presidents receive for the right to publish their memoirs after they leave the office? You're talking about around US$30++++million dollars. And do you know that the American President is mainly in-charge of foreign policy? State and federal are separate. In the US, you can have a lousy government and the country's economy will still accelerate or maintain its performance. In Singapore, one lousy government who back-pedals on its policies, the country sinks to oblivion. This is the fact. We survive and do well because of foreign investments. Without that, we have nothing.

If you scrutinse the portfolio of the new mps and ministers, many of them are not govt scholars or are they from SAF. It is not a matter of where or how the govt or PAP finds its candidates. The issue is actually very simple. It's a matter of practicality and a recognition of the harsh reality.

For example, ask yourself: Why have you chosen to do that particular undergraduate study? Can you deny that the possibility of having a good job that pays well is one large factor in dictating how you choose? Like you and all of us, everyone does cost-benefit analysis in deciding if to remain in private sector or enter public sector or office. And like many, even some of us, we have ruled out working in public sector because the pay is not as attractive. Who wants to work almost 24/7? Who wants to stay or accept a job that gives no distinction between public and private realm of life? Who wants to be constantly under the public's scrutiny? Who wants a job that denies them quality family time?

It is easy to dismiss all these and simply lambast the political leaders for the pay hike. But if you are in their position one day, I wonder if you will react differently. For we always impose an idealised imageof what ought to be on to what is really the case. And when reality deviates from our ideals, we simply lash out and condemn. Don't react emotionally. Open your mind. Or, help out at MPS sessions and see for yourself. After all, many MPs are looking for younger people to help out.

These are just my humble opinions. I understand many people will not see it the way I do. Try thinking the economics way and you might understand better. Think: opportunity costs :)

Take care

Kaixian



rmb to sign off! sang at 4:46 PM


Wednesday, May 09, 2007

Hey I'm back again. Forgot to remind everyone that there's a cable ski outing on the 20th of May. That'll be next sunday. Which is quite soon. So update your passports. Pack your bags. And for the NSFs, I know its payday but save some money!

Sunday, 20th May
Cable ski @ Batam
$83, inclusive of ferry tickets, ferry terminal tax and lunch
Full day (~7, 8 plus in the morning till 7 or 9 plus at night, depending on which ferry)
Beachwear
Updated passport



Liang Jian sang at 11:45 PM


Hi guys, just thought i'd put up this interesting article. I'm sure all of you have read about this issue in the papers, and as intelligent, discerning, concerned citizens would have your own opinions just waiting to be shared. Perhaps I'll start the ball rolling and pen my thoughts on this highly contentious topic.
Ahem.

Please pardon the crudeness.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

30 April 2007
Is this the start of Singapore's decline?

Article and open letter to our government by an ex-journalist
Yeo Toon Joo, Peter, 61
Ex-news editor Straits Times
Ex-assistant editor New Nation
Ex-secretary general Singapore National Union of Journalists
Ex-owner of a public relations company and broadcast PR firm> Hon. Fellow, Institute of Public Relations of Singapore


If the People's Action Party were to call a general election now, chances are it would lose a good number of seats to the opposition, that is, if you could find able candidates to join the opposition.

If certain changes do not take place in the ruling party's style of government, in time to come the PAP could lose power. That would be a shame, a tragedy for Singapore. But so strong has been the political backlash, and so great the people's outrage, over the government's widely unpopular decision and persistence to reward its cabinet ministers such handsome pay increases.

Dissenting and disapproving views over the latest round of ministerial pay hike have been eloquently articulated, often sneeringly so, but confined mainly to mass emailing and internet postings. The latest salary revision will by next year nearly double each minister's current remuneration, and bring it on average to nearly three times that of US President George Bush's, five times in the case of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong's.

Minister mentor Lee Kuan Yew had introduced in 1994 his formula of pegging ministerial salaries to 80 per cent of that of the top earners in six professions and businesses in Singapore. It gives Singapore the unique status of having the world's highest paid political leaders. Their individual salaries surpass by far those of leaders of the world's largest and most successful economies.

MM Lee's reasons were that unless he paid top dollar for the best brains he would not be able to attract good and talented people to serve as leaders of the country, retain their services, or keep them above corruption.
Problem is: he had been, for a long time now, looking for leaders in the wrong places, and following a policy that discourages emergence of potential ones. Some who entered the political fray had come a cropper. Not a few have served long terms of incarceration for their political beliefs or activities, others have had to flee the country to live (or die) in exile abroad.
Someone had not so many years back said that the best way to corrupt a person is to feed him so well you enslave him (did MM Lee say that?). Ironically then, in his effort to ensure that his leaders remain above corruption, he might have bought their souls.
From the relatively brief and muted parliament debate over this burning issue, there seems to be some cracks within the ruling party's own ranks. However mildly aired, there is, for sure, disquiet and differences of opinion among some PAP members of parliament. Still, what man of sound mind in Singapore would argue against being given a personal pay rise that first jacks up his annual salary to around $1 million and soon to nearly $2 million?
Feed them so well, they will never rebel.

I love my Singapore, and am thankful for the remarkable progress and prosperity it has achieved through the efforts of a stable and good government. I am immensely grateful, too, to the group of people who gave their all for the country in the pre-independence 1950s and our early days of nationhood.

I remain a loyal Singaporean who once had aspirations to serve our country, and did it initially (1960s and early 1970s) as a newspaper journalist, and through the Singapore National Union of Journalists and the National Trades Union Congress, of which SNUJ was affiliate.

I will carry to my grave, with great personal satisfaction, the memory of having been part of the team that pulled off the first successful workers' strike against a penny-pinching, ill-managed, callous Straits Times Group of Newspapers.

That industrial action, over the Christmas period of 1971, resulted in a fairer deal for several thousands of its employees in Malaysia and Singapore. It was a time of baptism under fire for my SNUJ colleagues and me. Some of us could have lost our jobs with no prospect of working for another English language newspaper in Singapore as there was none other.
The late Mr C V Devan Nair, leader of the National Trades Union Congress and later President of Singapore, was one of my role models and idols then. He had encouraged me as a union leader by helping to open up and broaden my mind.

In one of our several intimate conversations he challenged me to join the PAP. Later, someone suggested I joined an opposition party. But partisan politics was not my cup of tea, more so as I was mindful of the dangerous waters I would be plunging into. I also had little desire for such public prominence.

Also, and alas, any zeal for committing further to community or national leadership was quickly doused by a series of factors: one was my loss of faith in the Straits Times Group as an honest news organization. Mr Lee Kuan Yew helped put paid to it by his public parading and glorification of people who were steeped in scholarship, and humiliation of those who were not.

MM Lee, in searching for a second and then third generation of leaders, started looking for them first in academia (we know how it failed) and then to those who were government scholars.

At the same time we saw the hasty and, perhaps, premature retirement of our earlier PAP political leaders who had fire in their bellies but no multiple mortar boards on their head.

The harsh treatment of those with dissenting views, and slapping down of those brazen enough to join battle with the PAP and MM Lee at the hustings, quickly scared off those who thought they had something to offer to the country, but not necessarily as part of the PAP political apparatus.

Those with divergent, though not necessarily subversive, views were unmercifully smacked down. Others, seduced by the comforts and affluence their talents and training earned them in a prospering society (feed them so well they will never rebel), soon lost their idealism and passion for political sacrifice. It made political engagement not only a perilous pursuit but a wanton risk of losing all they had amassed materially, plus their personal freedom.

A PAP apologist recently condemned me for criticizing the incredible pay hikes for our cabinet leaders that has no precedent or matching model anywhere in the world.

"You can only criticize, but what's your solution?"

I believe I have something by way of solution, or at least an alternative view to what Mr Lee Kuan Yew insists is the only way to attract and nurture the right political leaders:

* Look for our future leaders not just among our scholastically successful Singaporeans; academic excellence does not equate with effective leadership. This quality might even disqualify a person from leadership.
* Look for people with a good and stout heart, undying love for Singapore and his/her fellowmen, and a burning desire to serve even at huge personal sacrifice – people with compassion, fire in their belly, grit in their gut, and steel in their back.
* Look for those who possess and exhibit the many other qualities of leadership. A yen for scholarship (at government's expense) alone is a poor prerequisite of leadership. Encouraging scholarship of our bright students through the lure of career and financial success couldproduce either more scholarship bond breakers or those who will work only for lucre (for those are the values you promote).
* If you encourage our government scholars to cherish high income, in a society exhorted to worship financial success, you will have to pay big bucks to get them to join your PAP ministerial ranks – definitely not the people you need or want to lead our country and inspire our countrymen.
* Rethink government policy, enunciated by MM Lee Kuan Yew, of encouraging potential leaders to chart their paths through the Armed Forces (with an SAF scholarship), then a stint in the civil service, a short spell in the private sector, and then to the PAP cabinet. You produce less open minded people who might possess a one-dimensional perspective of the world, a common mind set. Such a policy deprives you the services and creativity swimming so abundantly in the vast reservoir of talents out there in the real world. The military promotes obedience, viz. "Charge of the Light Brigade". You could end up with people paid well enough and sufficiently smart either to not charge with you – or charge blindly even when good sense tells them they should not.
* By all means encourage elitism but do not ridicule those who have interests and talents that are not skewed towards pursuit of a PhD. I cite one example of how MM Lee a few elections ago disparagingly compared the not as impressive academic achievements of our loyal opposition member, Mr Chiam See Tong, to those of his bright young submissive scholars.
* Do not intimidate or beat down all dissenters or those with alternative views, but judge them on their integrity, and do not swamp and swallow up those with potential for leadership into the PAP and high ministerial salaries. You end up with many 'yes' men.
* Open up the minds of Singaporeans by not controlling so rigidly the flow of information about their own country, whatever its flaws and foibles.
* Put in place committed, honest, mature and trained journalists over your mass media organizations, people with a feel for the ground and popular feeling, people trained in journalism (not just in academia) and bold enough to launch investigative journalistic enquiry that aid thinking and intelligent decision making by Singapore's people. If you find them do not stifle them. NOTE: such control of the press deprives you of an essential source of accurate feedback, and surrounds you with sycophantic counsel akin to that of the king with no clothes. The current mass media situation has encouraged a flourishing of emailing and postings on cyber space; they contain useful information as well as misinformation and disinformation, including ranting by irresponsible people.
* Let MM Lee's quest for self-renewal verily proceed. He should let the people he personally chose or vetted, take over fully. Let them err, let them rule (when is the appropriate time for this to happen?). MM Lee did not have a mentor to minister to him and his colleagues> in the tumultuous days of pre- and early post-independence – and did not flounder.

I am no political scientist, nor your scholastic type. But I have not been disabled from seeing another view to tackling our problem: there is no lack of leaders, only a lack of desire. Perhaps, there is a hesitation prompted by what is called fear.

We, in our immensely successful Singapore, owe much to MM Lee and his colleagues. There are many Singaporeans who want to cherish his legacy.

If the current controversy fuels more of the dangerous and divergent views and anti-government sentiments (even hatred) that have surfaced among our Singapore population, our remarkable success as a country could prove ephemeral. Singapore, especially with the Government's now liberal approach to matters of morality, could be another sad story of the decline and fall of a fledgling civilization. If that happens, we would, as the late Mr G G Thompson, director of the Singapore Political Study Centre once said, cause merely a small yawn in the world. We need not let that happen.



Liang Jian sang at 10:30 PM


Tuesday, May 08, 2007

hey peeps! since everyone is finally free...so i guess we can go ahead wif the plan to visit g tan and her newborn rite???

will either 19th or 26th May be good??? i guess we can go play ball in the morning....have lunch at ivins...and then go visit her?? tag or post a reply so tt i can inform g tan on the date....yup yup tt's all

hey eugene...add me to the cls blog...my username is soonheng87@gmail.com thnks thnks!



rmb to sign off! sang at 1:36 PM


SHOUTOUT!





LINKS

xx
eugene
kaiguan
jeff
05s64




ARCHIVES

June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008

CREDITS

layout: +
fonts: +
brushes: + +
image: +